State boards of accountancy have final authority on the acceptance of individual courses for CPE credit. Complaints regarding registered sponsors may be submitted to the National Registry of CPE Sponsors through its web site: www. Open, Collaborative Work Environment. The NRC strives to establish and maintain an open collaborative work environment (OCWE) that encourages all employees and contractors to promptly speak up and share concerns and differing. All right reserved by CDMP @ 2008, Designed and Maintained by DMIC. Enology Certificate Quick Facts. Cost – $5,995 if paid in full, $6,390 if paid in 3 installments of $2,130 each. Length – 20 months, starting every May. The 10 online courses in the Enology Certificate. Our field projects span the globe. We have more than 100 current international development projects worldwide, including projects in Iraq, Jordan, Afghanistan, South Sudan, Pakistan, Colombia, Paraguay and Kenya. Functional Behavioral Assessment: Identifying the Reasons for Problem Behavior and Developing a Behavior Plan This Module explores the basic principles of behavior and the importance of discovering the reasons that students. The author draws on his experience in conducting evaluations in developing countries and hopes that the ensuing. Summative Evaluation : Canada Student Loans Program, June 2011. Official Title: Summative Evaluation of the Canada Student Loans Program - June 2011. Evaluating Federal Social Programs: Finding Out What Works and What Does Not. Employee surveys are tools used by organizational leadership to gain feedback on and measure employee engagement, employee morale, and performance. Usually answered anonymously, surveys are also used to gain a holistic picture. Note: Class locations are subject to change. You will be informed of the class location in a reporting instructions e- mail that you will receive 3. Audit Peer Review (APR): Dates. Location. Tuition. Class Number. February 2. Washington, D. C. APR- 1. 70. 1August 3, 2. Washington, D. C. APR- 1. 70. 2Overview: CIGIE developed the Guide for Conducting External Peer Reviews of the Audit Organizations of Federal Offices of Inspector (CIGIE Audit Peer Review Guide) to help ensure member compliance with Government Auditing Standards (Yellow Book) that require agencies performing audits undergo external peer reviews at least once every three years. This training program is delivered twice per year to coincide with CIGIE’s audit peer review schedule. Who Should Attend: All CIGIE- member audit staff or managers (regardless of grade) involved in conducting an external peer review or those receiving a review should attend this overview- level training program. Those OIGs next scheduled to conduct or receive a peer review will have priority registration. Learning Objectives: Participants will learn how to conduct an external peer review following the CIGIE Audit Peer Review Guide as a reference. Specifically, participants will understand how to plan, perform, and report the results of a peer review. Participant reference materials include examples of peer reviews and checklists that can be used in conducting a review. Delivery Method: 1 day; instructor and panel- based group live. CPE: 8 (Auditing- Governmental)Comments from Participants: “As I am involved in my first peer review, the training was very impactful.”“The instructors were interesting and encouraged students to participate, ask questions, and discuss issues.”“I learned not to evaluate the organization based off my office’s policies and procedures or operating style, rather by standards.”Register. CEW- 1. 70. 1March 2. Washington, D. C. CEW- 1. 70. 2May 2. Washington, D. C. CEW- 1. 70. 3June 2. Dallas, TX$4. 00. CEW- 1. 70. 4July 2. Washington, D. C. CEW- 1. 70. 5August 8- 9, 2. Washington, D. C. CEW- 1. 70. 6August 2. Washington, D. C. Although supervisors provide feedback to their staff on written products to ensure compliance with such standards, they often spend time rewriting documents because they find it difficult to coach their subordinates on how to rewrite unacceptable drafts. This advanced- level training program is one of three writing training programs within the Academy’s writing curriculum the others being Writing Fundamentals and Writing Effective Reports. Who Should Attend: Auditors, inspectors, and evaluator team leads, supervisors, or managers (GS- 1. Other supervisory or managerial- level professionals who review written products would also benefit from this training. Learning Objectives: Through this highly interactive program, participants will discover their own writing style and personal preferences. Upon completion of this class participants will know strategies to more effectively deliver feedback explaining the underlying reasons why draft products were changed. Over time, receiving quality feedback should enable staff to submit better draft products that require less review time. Participants have the opportunity between the two- day class and the follow- up, half- day session to practice your strategies and share lessons learned. Delivery Method: 2. Prerequisites: Prior to the start of class, you are required to complete brief reading and writing assignments and then bring “before- and- after” and/or “new and not yet reviewed” writing samples to class. CPE: 1. 8 upon completion of both segments (Communications)Comments from Participants: “The translation rules will serve as a great technique for better communicating how I want employees to improve their writing.”“The instructor is the only one I’ve seen that can take the writing problems that students discuss and suggest ways to handle and/or overcome them.”“I enjoyed the program and believe it has made me a better supervisor. I learned a lot of good techniques in this course that have helped me tremendously with my own writing.”Register. CTS- 1. 70. 2January 1. Washington, D. C. CTS- 1. 70. 3April 4- 6, 2. Washington, D. C. CTS- 1. 70. 4May 2- 4, 2. Washington, D. C. CTS- 1. 70. 5June 6- 8, 2. Washington, D. C. CTS- 1. 70. 6September 1. Washington, D. C. CTS- 1. 70. 7Overview: : Critical thinking skills are a core competency listed in the Quality Standards for Federal Offices of Inspector General. All CIGIE- member staff should possess the skills to logically collect and process information in conducting their work. This overview- level training program will help participants to better understand how and why they think, as well as learn about the barriers that prevent them from thinking more clearly, making better informed decisions, and taking more effective actions. Who Should Attend: OIG auditors, inspectors, and evaluators who want to improve their job performance by sharpening their mental skills and problem solving abilities; however, other CIGIE- member professionals would also benefit from this training. Learning Objectives: Through this highly interactive class, participants will learn how to apply a variety of good thinking concepts in conducting OIG work. Specifically, participants will be able to use the elements of reasoning; apply Socratic questioning; distinguish between problem solving and decision making; and detect logical fallacies. Delivery Method: 3 days; instructor group live. Prerequisites: You must complete a thinking style self- assessment and document a real- life example of when better critical thinking skills could have been applied. CPE: 2. 1 (Auditing . I understand how to apply thinking principles in my job function.”“I learned how to understand and evaluate my interactions with others by independently listening to others and acknowledging what information they are trying to relate.. I think.”“Great instructor with engaging teaching methods.. I think and where I need to improve.. I have taken.”Register. IEF- 1. 70. 1February 6- 1. Washington, D. C. IEF- 1. 70. 2May 8- 1. Washington, D. C. IEF- 1. 70. 3June 2. Washington, D. C. IEF- 1. 70. 4Overview: Grounded in CIGIE’s Quality Standards for Inspection and Evaluation (Blue Book), this basic- level training program is designed to introduce you to the fundamentals of inspection and evaluation (I& E) work in the federal Inspector General community. This highly interactive class includes group discussions and exercises, a mock evaluation case study conducted in teams, and various networking opportunities with CIGIE- member colleagues. Who Should Attend: I& E professionals who have not previously received basic inspection and evaluation training and/or conducted I& E work in accordance with the Blue Book. This training program is not designed for CIGIE- member audit professionals who conduct work under Government Auditing Standards (see our Introductory Auditor (IA) class for that training). Learning Objectives: Upon completion of this program, participants will gain new insights into the Blue Book. They will learn how to improve their skills in specific inspection and evaluation areas such as working relationships and communication, planning, evidence collection and analysis, reporting, and follow up. Delivery Method: 4. Prerequisites: None, however, you should review the Blue Book prior to attending class. CPE: 3. 2 (Specialized Knowledge and Applications)Participant Evaluation Comments: “Very informative and useful mock exercises. Great instruction and passion for the work.”“Good tips and background. Case studies and exercises are excellent teaching tools.”“I enjoyed the table discussions, role playing, and movement exercises to facilitate learning.”“The overall training program was exceptional and planted the overall picture of inspections and evaluations and CIGIE.”Register. IGA- 1. 70. 1June 1, 2. Seattle, WA$1. 25. IGA- 1. 70. 2Overview: The Inspector General Reform Act of 2. P. L. 1. 10- 4. 09) statutorily established CIGIE as an independent entity within the executive branch. CIGIE is comprised of all OIGs established under section 2 or section 8. G of the Inspector General Act of 1. U. S. C. These laws mandate the obligations and discretionary authorities afforded to federal OIGs. Attorney instructors from within the CIGIE community review the authorities available to OIGs to support the work conducted by auditors, inspectors, evaluators, and investigators. Who Should Attend: Auditors, inspectors, evaluators, attorneys, and mission support personnel at all grade levels should attend this overview- level training program to better understand what mandatory and discretionary authorities they have in conducting their OIG work. Learning Objectives: Participants will learn the history of federal OIGs, why they were created by Congress, which issues the IG Acts address, and other sources of IG authority and obligations. Participants will have ample opportunity to ask questions and share experiences. Delivery Method: 1 day; attorney instructor group live. Prerequisites: None. CPE: 7 (Business Law)Comments from Participants: “I have a greater understanding of our independence and how to request information. I really appreciated the instructors’ insight and knowledge, and ability to relate matters to my work.”“Very informative and interesting and it was great to have someone with working knowledge leading the training. This allowed the discussion to be very relevant to what we do.”“This course was perfect for me with just a few months IG experience. Thank you and I look forward to additional CIGIE training events.”Register. IA- 1. 70. 1January 2. February 1, 2. 01. Washington, D. C. IA- 1. 70. 2March 2. Washington, D. C. IA- 1. 70. 3May 1. Washington, D. C.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
October 2017
Categories |